In recent years, remakes have become a popular phenomenon, with people seeking to remake classic films both at home and abroad. However, complaining about remakes is nothing new, why do you still enjoy making remakes? The classic remake will bring its own hot topic that can provoke audience to kill, and it is also a double-edged sword piercing remake.
I believe that every artist has requirements and ideas for their own work, and sometimes it's a very bold idea to dare to break free from shackles of classics. These new studies often need to be carefully analyzed by audience with classic filters and compared to classics throughout article. In fact, this behavior is not suitable for development of remakes.
Take, for example, new film "The Tale of Deer and Dean". The huge amount of "bad reviews" caused everyone to ignore innovation that director wanted to make. If everything is compared to classic version, remake will naturally lose its charm. Based on this reflection, should we leave a little room for freedom when viewing new "History of Deer and Dean"?
A thousand Hamlets for a thousand people, and maybe a thousand views of Tale of Stag and Dean filmed by a thousand people. If you set limits ahead of time, it's like looking in a mirror, and in end it's not fun.